Did you know...
That according to the handbook, "Clinical Toxicology of
Commercial Products," fluoride is more poisonous than lead and
just slightly less poisonous than arsenic.
That according to the Physicians'
Desk Reference: "In hypersensitive individuals, fluoride
occasionally causes skin eruptions such as atopic dermatitis, eczema,
or urticaria. Gastric distress, headache, and weakness have also
been reported. These hypersensitive reactions usually disappear promptly
after discontinuation of the fluoride."
That the Canadian Dental Association
recommends: "Fluoride supplements should not be recommended for
children less than three years old."
That from 1990 to 1992, the Journal
of the American Medical Association published three separate
articles linking increased hip fracture rates to fluoride in the
water.
That in the March 22, 1990 issue
of the New England Journal of Medicine, Mayo Clinic researchers
reported that fluoride treatment of osteoporosis increased hip fracture
rate and bone fragility.
That a study by Proctor and Gamble
showed that as little as half the amount of fluoride used to fluoridate
public water supplies resulted in a sizable and significant increase
in genetic damage.
That in 1993, researchers from the
National Institute of Environmental Health admitted:
"in cultured human and rodent cells, the weight of the evidence
leads to the conclusion that fluoride exposure results in increased
chromosome aberrations [genetic damage]."
That in 1988, the ability of fluoride
to transform normal cells into cancer cells was confirmed by Argonne
National Laboratories.
That the research of Dr. Dean Burk,
former Chief Chemist of the National Cancer Institute, showed that
about 10,000 or more fluoridation-linked cancer deaths occur yearly
in the United States.
That results from Battelle Research
Institute showed that fluoride was linked to a rare form of liver cancer
in mice, oral tumors and cancers in rats, and bone cancer in male rats.
That since 1990, the National Cancer
Institute, the New Jersey Department of Health, and the Safe Water
Foundation all found that the incidence of osteosarcoma, a type of
bone cancer, was far higher in young men exposed to fluoridated water
as compared to those who were not.
Toothpaste warning labels concern parents
By DON OLDENBURG The Washington Post
Last month, as 8-year-old Molly Statt stood
in the bathroom brushing her teeth, something on the back of the tube
of Crest caught her attention. She stopped brushing. Looking up at her
father standing beside her, she asked, "Is this poison?"
"Of course not,"
Paul Statt reassured his daughter. "Then why does it say 'poison'
on it?" she asked.
Statt looked more closely at the label. In
small print were warnings he hadn't noticed before, including one that
read: "If you accidentally swallow more than
used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control
center immediately."
Like most people, the Petersborough, N.H.,
resident assumed that an over-the-counter health-care product like toothpaste
must certainly be as safe as the water we drink. But it's not. And that's
the message of the new warning labels required by the Food and Drug Administration
on all fluoride toothpastes and dental care products shipped as of April
7 (year).
"When I receive the fluoride here, it
has a skull-and-bones on it," Regina Miskewitz says of the containers
of the chemical at the Princeton, N.J., laboratories of Church & Dwight
Co. Inc., maker of Arm & Hammer products, where she is director of
research and development for oral and personal care.
"If a child was to take a big spoonful
of this fluoride, I don't think he could swallow it," she says, "but
if he did get it down, it is a poison and the child could die. If a child
ingested a whole tube of toothpaste, he should be taken to the emergency
room and he would either get his stomach pumped or get some kind of antidote."
Three ingredients found in most toothpastes
pose health risks if too much is ingested, according to Miskewitz. Sorbitol,
a liquid that keeps toothpaste from drying out, is a laxative that could
cause diarrhea in children. Sodium lauryl sulfate, an ingredient that
makes toothpaste foam,can also be a diarrhetic. But the fluoride poses
the most danger if too much toothpaste is swallowed - particularly by
younger children.
This summer, as toothpaste shipments with
the new labeling replace older inventories, consumers will see nearly
twice the warnings displayed on the back of tubes and cartons - ADA's
general warnings along with the new FDA-required statement that starts
with:"Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age."
Research has shown that because they aren't
yet in control of their swallowing reflex, children 4 - 6 years old typically
swallow toothpaste when brushing. "That's why it's recommended that
kids get only a pea-sized amount of toothpaste,"
says Miskewitz, "because most of that goes down their throats."
A 1995 study at the Georgia School of Dentistry
found that about half of the children this age don't spit out or rinse
out - they swallow the toothpaste instead. Making matters worse, they
tend to use too much toothpaste on their own, especially when they use
flavored children's toothpastes.
While the cavity-preventing effectiveness
of fluoride has been demonstrated, too much fluoride not only can be
dangerous, it can cause a condition known as fluorosis, which discolors
or spots developing teeth. Research conducted by the School of Dental
Medicine at the University of Connecticut Health Center concluded that
brushing with more than a pea-size amount of toothpaste more than once
daily contributed to most of the fluorosis cases it observed in young
children. In areas where the drinking water contains fluoride, children
who swallow even the pea-size amount of toothpaste are getting too much
fluoride and are at risk for fluorosis."
It is always kind of a trade-off," says
Nancy Rosenzweig, vice-president of corporate communication and market
development at Tom's of Maine, which in 1975 introduced the first "natural" toothpaste
on the market. The company recently began marketing a new line of natural
toothpastes for children which eliminates synthetic sweetners but contains
fluoride."
We made a decision to have only fluoride toothpaste
for children because that has been proven to be the overall benefit of
toothpaste for children," Rosenzweig says. "We feel the benefit
outweighs the negative."
In fact, many in the toothpaste industry feel
the new FDA warnings may be overstating the risks."
Our position was that they went a little too
far" says Clifford Whall, director of product evaluations on the
ADA's Council on Scientific affairs. "There wasn't really a need
for the cautionary statement about the danger of poisoning if you've
ingested too much.".
While Whall concedes that poison control centers
do receive reports of fluoride "poisonings"
every year, he says the ADA isn't aware of any of those cases resulting
in adverse affects. "It just hasn't proven to be that kind of problem....we
didn't think you needed a label like that because it could unnecessarily
scare consumers into not using toothpaste."